Therefore, the match was dismissed since the plaintiff experienced not succeeded in proving that the gift was, actually, a sale. The petitioners/defendants didn't establish the genuineness of the gift mutation with required facts and unimpeachable proof. The respondent’s omission to claim fraud from his father defeated the authorized foundation for https://co-ownership-and-partitio88269.ampedpages.com/the-basic-principles-of-gifts-hiba-in-islamic-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me-58482183